On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote: > Can you please update the FS that you will focus on KVM & Xen for CS 4.1 > release?
Updated. --Sheng > > Regards, > Manan Shah > > > > > On 1/23/13 5:38 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > >>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> Sheng, the FS does not talk about any Hypervisor limitations. Is it >>> assumed that this feature would be supported on all hypervisors? >> >>Yes. We would focus on KVM and Xen first. >> >>--Sheng >>> >>> Regards, >>> Manan Shah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/22/13 12:58 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Chip Childers >>>><chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway. This is >>>>>>>³by >>>>>>> design². >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that. >>>>>> >>>>>> So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case indeed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do. >>>>>>> There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic and >>>>>>>not >>>>>>> many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is >>>>>>>best to >>>>>>> approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it >>>>>>and warn >>>>>> that stuff can change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wido >>>>> >>>>> +1 to incremental development, and +1*10 for labeling it >>>>> "experimental" for at least the first couple of releases! >>>> >>>>+1.. >>>> >>>>--Sheng >>> >
