DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway. This is ³by design².
I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do. There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic and not many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is best to approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way. On 1/20/13 10:33 AM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: >Hi, > >On 01/17/2013 04:11 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support >> now. >> >> Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to stick to >> dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase one, >> to make thing as simple as possible in phase 1. >> >> Comments/questions are welcome! >> > >What's the reason for not doing this in basic networking first? Isn't >that the easiest one? > >I'm getting the feeling that this implementation will be rushed in by >just skipping a lot of things just to get *some* IPv6 in CloudStack. > >We can't just add IPv6 and say *experimental* because people will start >using it. > >And why is there a need for radvd when using DHCPv6? > >Wido > >> --Sheng >>
