I vote along with Jesse. He says it all.
Jesse Kline wrote:
I'll place my vote for leaving things the way they are. I like only
having to subscribe to one list. Sure not all of the topics interest me,
but I read them anyway in the hopes of gaining new knowledge. I would
hate to see useful info. pass us by just because we are not subscribed
to a certain CLUG list. Also, say for example I don't like coding, but
in a coding question I have an answer to a certain problem. The person
asking that question would not be able to gain the knowledge that I have
just because he posted it to the wrong list. If he were to post it to
two lists then those of us subscribed to both lists would be getting
duplicates of the same message. I know the group is growing, but I don't
think we should start fractioning off the group quite yet. Part of the
reason why we have been able to accomplish some great stuff like trying
to become a society, having a great booth at convergence, etc. Is
because the group has come together recently to make the things happen.
I think dividing us up would only set us back a couple of years.
Jesse
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Bourassa at
http://members.shaw.ca/djb.enterprises/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who
understand binary and those who don't."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
