Could be, both of them are unset in my system ... Cheers Szemir I still find it odd that an application would requere settings regarding LD_LIB to be in a particular way, rather than parsing it itself ...
On February 6, 2007 17:15, Mark Carlson wrote: > Is that supposed to be LD_LIBRARY_PATH instead of LB_LIBRARY_PATH? > > -Mark > > On 2/6/07, bogi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > echo $LB_LIBRARY_PATH > > and see what you get, I do get nothing, so mine is not set, but i am > > running the 32 bit version of things. Now, looking at the issue, your > > application might actually want the 32 bit versions of these libraries, > > and it either does not find them at all, or only finds the 64 bit version > > once. Try the rpm, and let it accept the not-signed packages, and then, > > hopefully you would be able to install your package with the full scope > > of dependencies. > > > > Got to go > > Cheers > > Szemir > > > > On February 5, 2007 13:45, R A L Carter wrote: > > > Szemir > > > > > > Thanks for this suggestion: > > > >, you > > > > need to find, from the existing values of LB_LIBRARY_PATH weather > > > > it contains > > > > the 32 bit libs first or the 64 bit libs first, and reverse the 2 > > > > pathnames. > > > > > > I'm still a "newbie" so I have to ask---- how do I do this? > > > > > > Robin > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) > **Please remove these lines when replying _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
