Is that supposed to be LD_LIBRARY_PATH instead of LB_LIBRARY_PATH? -Mark
On 2/6/07, bogi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > echo $LB_LIBRARY_PATH > and see what you get, I do get nothing, so mine is not set, but i am running > the 32 bit version of things. Now, looking at the issue, your application > might actually want the 32 bit versions of these libraries, and it either > does not find them at all, or only finds the 64 bit version once. Try the > rpm, and let it accept the not-signed packages, and then, hopefully you would > be able to install your package with the full scope of dependencies. > > Got to go > Cheers > Szemir > > On February 5, 2007 13:45, R A L Carter wrote: > > Szemir > > > > Thanks for this suggestion: > > >, you > > > need to find, from the existing values of LB_LIBRARY_PATH weather > > > it contains > > > the 32 bit libs first or the 64 bit libs first, and reverse the 2 > > > pathnames. > > > > I'm still a "newbie" so I have to ask---- how do I do this? > > > > Robin _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
