Don't hold your breath. I have never wanted to be dependent on any government for my needs. Governments through the history of man, have always turned tyrannical (name 1 that didn't), and our founders knew that, and tried to create a system that left the individual responsible to determine their own fate and "pursuit of happiness", not the government. Doesn't it bother anyone that a union that donated 70 million dollars to the present presidents campaign, gets special dispensations from this administration, and that this government is going to FORCE you to buy something you may not want or need? By the way is that a tax?
I also know that each one of us is surviving because of the best healthcare system in the world, bar none. Canada's socialist system has waiting lists for tests and procedures of up to six months. If they need an CT, well, that will be a 6 month wait. If the CT finds a brain tumor that will be another 6 month wait. It is so bad right now that even the Canadian Supreme court has ruled that being placed on a waiting list isn't access to healthcare. If you doubt me copy and paste link http://neamh.cns.uni.edu/MedInfo/canadian_healthcare.html. Let me ask you a question, how long did you have to wait for healthcare when you were diagnosed with CML? I for one was diagnosed at 11:00 am and was admitted to the first local hospital by 12:00 noon and to the second hospital 250 miles away by 11:00 PM that same day, and treatments started by midnight, lets see that happen in England or Canada or anywhere else. It is one of the few things that this country maintains it superiority over every other country in the world, yet we want to fix it? Does it not bother you that the healthcare bill is probably unconstitutional? Our constitution was meant to limit what government can do to us and/or for us. Don't bother saying that we are already forced to by auto insurance so whats the difference? The difference is that mandatory car insurance is required by the states not the federal government. Look, our constitution was created to protect us from government. Now your going to trash it? When I was in the military in1967, I swore to protect and defend the constitution of the United States of America, and I don't believe there was a statute of limitations on that oath. The same thing goes for our elected officials when they took office. We are presently bankrupt as a country, yet we are creating the biggest entitlement program we have ever tried. Right now, the gross national product ( the total of everything produced in this country in goods and services) is $14,500,000,000,000. Do you know how much our country is in debt right now $14,100,000,000,000. Take a look for yourself. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Just to give you some idea of the size and scope of this program, try this on for size. The largest salaried organization in the world is the Chinese Army. No real surprise there is it? The second largest is the Indian railroad. Who would have thought that India's railroad was that big? Are you ready for the third largest employer in the world? The British healthcare system!!! Does that give you any concept of what this healthcare bill takes over and just how big it will be and much it will cost? Right now, the federal government subsidizes, (depending on the state) up to 2/3 of the state Medicaid cost for the individual states. For example, if state X contributes 1.5 Billion dollars to the State Medicaid program, the Federal government will contribute an additional 3.0 Billion. You may say so what? Well Medicaid will be doubled in size under the federal healthcare bill and within 5 years, the states will be left to fund the full thing without any federal matching funds (you may remember Nebraska was almost exempted). So just how much will your state have to raise your taxes to pay for that new state program. The pity to this little jewel, is that this wasn't added into the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) cost forecasts, because the feds aren't going to have to tax you for it, the state governments will, and almost all of them are in a serious debt crisis already. The healthcare bill said it was going to reduce Medicare payments by 500 million dollars. Now just how do you think they are going to do that. In short they aren't and if you do believe that, I have a bridge in San Francisco I'll sell you real cheap. Even if they did cut expenditures in Medicare, it will be by reducing benefits. However, that won't happen, because everyone will riot over that. Look, why can't we build this system step by step over time to make sure we're not going to go into further bankruptcy. There is also another thing called the rule of unintended consequences. What unintended consequences will this massive bill create? No one knows since by definition it's unintended consequences. On Feb 4, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Minsu KYEONG wrote: > Daniel, > > Will you take some time looking at the health care reform act? > > I know why you have such abhorrance against government doing anything. > But think about whether private-is-all-efficient rule is another > propaganda. > > From the point of view of a foreigner who once lived in the U.S., the > country has one of the worst health insurance systems and I feel > relieved that the health care reform act made it at least a little > better. And I hope you will realize it soon and add a helping hand in > making it better. > > On 2월4일, 오전12시50분, Daniel Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> Victoria, I think you missed my point. You wrote, "Our representatives in >> Congress receive health-care coverage that every other citizen in the >> country would love to have", and you are absolutely right, "every citizen in >> the country would love to have it"! >> >> My question was, if the new healthcare bill is so great, why are our elected >> representatives in the house and senate exempted from having to be on it. >> Why do they get to stay on their own special health insurance. I would think >> that it would be the moral and ethical thing for them to say, "that we are >> so confident in the quality of care in this new healthcare bill, that we >> will go on it just like everyone else in the country"! >> >> Wouldn't that have been proof that they really believe this healthcare bill >> is a good thing? Plus, there is a moral and ethical responsibility to do so, >> wouldn't you think? I mean, how moral is it to do something to everyone else >> that your not willing to do to yourself? >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Victoria Reiter wrote: >> >> >> >>> Our representatives in Congress receive health-care coverage that every >>> other citizen in the country would love to have > > -- > [CMLHope] > A support group of http://cmlhope.com > ------------------------------------------------- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "CMLHope" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope -- [CMLHope] A support group of http://cmlhope.com ------------------------------------------------- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CMLHope" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope
