Hi Suzieq,

Hopefully soon. but it will come eventually, and I thank you for the 18's
to everyone. Lately I have noticed more and more people on this site have
been also using it.

As far as the Desferal, I guess that it wasn't around when I had my bone
marrow transplant and receiving those 93 blood transfusions. Besides since
I had very little hemoglobin or red cells it probably didn't make too much
of difference.

18's and hugs [?]

Marty

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:45 AM, 'educatorsusan' via CMLHope <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I am not used to this new google format.  So, I am going to answer a few
> things.
>
> First of all, if you are getting transfusions (more than 10) you need to
> receive Desferal which is an iron chelator.  If you do not, your iron
> counts were be sky high.  I know this from personal experience.  My
> ferritin level is finally in the normal range after 10 years as of this
> past Wednesday!!!  YEAH!!  There is a  newer chelator but Oregon (Dr.
> Druker and his own hematologist) decided to leave me alone because I had a
> reaction to the Desferal...I have a reaction to everything it seems.
> Desferal took the zinc out of my body and well and I could not bend my
> hands, etc. and was in some amount of pain.
>
> No matter how much iron rich foods you eat, this will not help you and it
> will not hurt you.  The type of hemoglobin you are not manufacturing DOES
> NOT react to iron rich foods...another myth that Dr. Druker and my own
> hematologist locally dispelled.  I do not understand the total logic but
> they are different animals in the system.
>
> Congratulations, Marty, on finally receiving a kidney transplant soon!!!
>
> In Marty's honor, 18's to everyone!
>
> Hope my two cents worth is useful!
>
> I wanted to post to everyone and am not sure I did.
>
> I usually have a postscript after my name giving you my LONG history on
> Gleevec bu cannot find it right now.  If you search my name on this "blog",
> you'll find it...I just do not know how to use this "new" google yet...
>
> Hugs,
> Susan Rosenthal
> Miami, Florida
>
> On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 9:44:45 AM UTC-5, Suzieq wrote:
>>
>> Hello CML Survivors:
>>
>> It's been some time since I stopped by and left word.  Thought that I
>> should check on ya'll.....sorry to hear of the troubles you are having
>> Marty.  I do hope you receive your Kidney and all goes well.  Jeanie...I
>> see you are having a few problems once again and I hope that the doctors
>> can get you back on track. So many newer drugs now than when we all started
>> our journey with Gleevec.
>>
>> My last doctor visit was December 31st.  Had really good blood work
>> results and all looked good until I got my BCR-ABL results back.  They did
>> not tell me that they were going to use a new lab.....instead of sending it
>> to where they always did,  they (Sitemen Cancer Center) are now doing the
>> testing in-house.  I knew that the results had come back a lot quicker.
>> Nothing like what I was use to, no graph, nothing.  Just said
>> *"Positive"*  &* 0.02%.*  I fell apart.  Course this was around 7:00 at
>> night when I had picked up the mail after going to the movies. My husband
>> was out of town.   The next morning (Friday), I called and left a message
>> for the doctor to call me back. It was around 4 that afternoon when the NP
>> called me back and we had a nice chat. That's when she told me that "we
>> really can't go by these results since we are using a new lab.  And,  it
>> was a *"more sensitive"* test."  I asked her if I should up my dosage
>> (remember I have gone from 400mgs. down to 200, & now to 100mgs. since I've
>> been *"non-detected"* since *July '09.*  She told me no, to stay doing
>> what I've always done and that if I wanted to come back in earlier than the
>> ever six months as normally, I could.  So, we set that up where I will go
>> back next month (March) the 25th and be retested.
>>
>> I guess I was so use to seeing that "non-detected" over a long period of
>> time, that it gives one that false belief that we are in total remission
>> and the CML is gone.  It's like my husband & I discussed......a few of the
>> leukemic cells are still there all along,  just do not show up unless they
>> use deeper tests.  This positive test brought me back to reality and
>> reminded me exactly what Dr. Khoury told me in the beginning of my journey,
>> "There is no cure for CML yet."
>>
>> So, there's my story. I guess we will always be in this fight for the
>> rest of our lives.  I'm hoping to continue on just the 100mgs.,  but if I
>> need to go back to the higher dosage, I will.
>>
>> Keep Looking Up,
>> Suzieq
>>
>  --
> --
> [CMLHope]
> A support group of http://cmlhope.com
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "CMLHope" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "CMLHope" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
[CMLHope]
A support group of http://cmlhope.com
-------------------------------------------------

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CMLHope" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CMLHope" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to