Sounds a bit loaded, but I would be interested to see how it turns out. It will be tough to give a non-biased review given the relationship you have with PaperThin. And you'll have to be aware that the audience may be looking for biases in your review once they know you have a relationship with one of the vendors.
Again, I'd be interested to see how it turns out. On 12/12/02 9:43 AM, "Steve Drucker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Each of these low-midrange CMS has significant strengths and weaknesses that > we will be discussing in the seminar. All are being reviewed fairly based > on our implementation experience. Cheers! Todd R. Warfel _//message first [method second] .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--. _//user experience architect Information architecture Interaction design Usability analysis [P] (607) 339-9640 [E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [w] http://www.mk27.com .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--. In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not -- anonymous -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.
