Thanks for the replies guys. I guess I'm not crazy then! If the owners themselves don't know the difference I don't feel so bad. Also, it means the older boats are worth considering. I'm also reading mixed reports of cored vs non-cored hulls. Anyone care to comment on that one?? Mostly I read that they are cored all the way down.
Thanks, Steve Suhana, C&C 32 Toronto On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:57 AM, ahycrace--- via CnC-List < cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > Jim and Steve > My 1976 hull# 99 has old perf papers that call it a mk I. > I have been trying to find out the difference for years. At the Mystic > rendezvous I asked Rob Ball and he didn't know said it might have been a > marketing thing. > > .....................Gary Kolc......"Liberty" > ---- jtsails via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > > Steve, the break between the Mk1 and Mk2 is a total mystery to me. I own > Hull #100 which was built in 1976 while Rick Brass has hull #47 built > sometime in 1975? All evidence indicates that my boat is a Mk2 while Rick's > is a Mk1. I have been on both boats and I'll be darned if I can find any > difference and in my opinion there is no difference. My guess is that C&C > didn't like the measurement certificate for the early boats and decided to > call the next years boat a Mk2 to get the boat remeasured (just a stab in > the dark guess though). Keep in mind that the 38 was designed as a large 1 > tonner and the Mk1 was rated slightly above the cut off. I have also > noticed that the brochures on the the website do not make any distinction > in the different years. Various sources list different dimensions for the > beam measurement, and again I can't spot it between the two boats. I > suspect that is due to measuring the beam on deck (narrower) versus the > overall beam (wider). Some of the sources list the Mk1 as being 6" narrower > but that is about the amount of tumblehome in the sides. PHRF also rates > them the same. > > James > > S/V Delaney > > 1976 C&C 38 > > Oriental, NC > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Stevan Plavsa via CnC-List > > To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:46 AM > > Subject: Stus-List C&C 38 mk1 vs mk2 > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I can't seem to find what the cut-off date was for the 38 between the > mk1 and the mk2. Any ideas? I'm not buying a new boat anytime soon but you > know, window shopping and maintaining a short list. Sailboatdata lists the > MK2 as having IOR specific changes over the MK1, not sure what that means > though? The MK3 is a totally different boat. The 38 has really grown on me > and I think it's a really pretty boat. I've read that at least one or two > have circumnavigated and they are a lot of boat for the money. Just looking > for more info. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Steve > > Suhana, C&C 32 > > Toronto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album > > > > Email address: > > CnC-List@cnc-list.com > > To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom > of page at: > > http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album > > Email address: > CnC-List@cnc-list.com > To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of > page at: > http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com > >
_______________________________________________ This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
