Ron
I'm looking at an old PHRF-NE (1996) out of Marion Ma. and the rating is
117 with a 140% so I think that would be about 111 with a 150.
....................Gary Kolc........"Liberty" Hull # 99
---- Ron Casciato via CnC-List <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI Steve: Just to add to the listing…………..my 1977 38 is Hull #125; the
> original build paperwork shows that it was built in the “Bruckman Shop” and
> has the designation of MKIIC. Someone mentioned the PHRF ratings of the
> two……….New England PHRF rates the MKI at 111 and the MKII at 114. Go figure.
>
>
>
> My experience is that a rating around 114 would be tough to sail to in our
> fleets up here. Adding the cruising allowance for a working roller furling
> adds 6 seconds to the racing rating.=120. That makes my “Cruising” rating
> 132 for a masthead rig. Since I use an ASYM instead of a Symmetrical
> Spinnaker. I can declare “no pole” and that adds 9 Seconds to the 120………so
> today, I’m sailing with a racing rating of 129 and the cruising rating of
> 132………..and the boat will definitely sail to those ratings.
>
>
>
> This boat looks and runs like new……….even better with the Yanmar
> Saildrive……………recommended by Rob Ball.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Ron C.
>
> Impromptu
>
> MKIIC…..’77
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stevan
> Plavsa via CnC-List
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 1:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 38 mk1 vs mk2
>
>
>
> Thanks for the replies guys. I guess I'm not crazy then! If the owners
> themselves don't know the difference I don't feel so bad. Also, it means the
> older boats are worth considering. I'm also reading mixed reports of cored vs
> non-cored hulls. Anyone care to comment on that one?? Mostly I read that they
> are cored all the way down.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Suhana, C&C 32
>
> Toronto
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:57 AM, ahycrace--- via CnC-List
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
>
> Jim and Steve
> My 1976 hull# 99 has old perf papers that call it a mk I. I
> have been trying to find out the difference for years. At the Mystic
> rendezvous I asked Rob Ball and he didn't know said it might have been a
> marketing thing.
>
> .....................Gary Kolc......"Liberty"
>
> ---- jtsails via CnC-List <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > Steve, the break between the Mk1 and Mk2 is a total mystery to me. I own
> > Hull #100 which was built in 1976 while Rick Brass has hull #47 built
> > sometime in 1975? All evidence indicates that my boat is a Mk2 while Rick's
> > is a Mk1. I have been on both boats and I'll be darned if I can find any
> > difference and in my opinion there is no difference. My guess is that C&C
> > didn't like the measurement certificate for the early boats and decided to
> > call the next years boat a Mk2 to get the boat remeasured (just a stab in
> > the dark guess though). Keep in mind that the 38 was designed as a large 1
> > tonner and the Mk1 was rated slightly above the cut off. I have also
> > noticed that the brochures on the the website do not make any distinction
> > in the different years. Various sources list different dimensions for the
> > beam measurement, and again I can't spot it between the two boats. I
> > suspect that is due to measuring the beam on deck (narrower) versus the
> > overall beam (wider). Some of the sources list the Mk1 as being 6" narrower
> > but that is about the amount of tumblehome in the sides. PHRF also rates
> > them the same.
> > James
> > S/V Delaney
> > 1976 C&C 38
> > Oriental, NC
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Stevan Plavsa via CnC-List
> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:46 AM
> > Subject: Stus-List C&C 38 mk1 vs mk2
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > I can't seem to find what the cut-off date was for the 38 between the mk1
> > and the mk2. Any ideas? I'm not buying a new boat anytime soon but you
> > know, window shopping and maintaining a short list. Sailboatdata lists the
> > MK2 as having IOR specific changes over the MK1, not sure what that means
> > though? The MK3 is a totally different boat. The 38 has really grown on me
> > and I think it's a really pretty boat. I've read that at least one or two
> > have circumnavigated and they are a lot of boat for the money. Just looking
> > for more info.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
> > Suhana, C&C 32
> > Toronto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> >
> > Email address:
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of
> > page at:
> > http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>
> Email address:
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page
> at:
> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
Email address:
[email protected]
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page
at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
