So true Joel, so true.

On Dec 12, 2017 12:48 PM, "Joel Aronson via CnC-List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
wrote:

Josh,

Just need a $20,000 main!

Joel

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Matthew,
>
> All the high tech low stretch line in the world can't make up for the
> stretch in the sail.  I suspect that  this is the primary reason you'll
> need to use the cunningham.  I have a stay-set halyard for my spinnaker and
> regularly use it for climbing the mast.  It is noticeably stretchy whereas
> the high tech line (crystalline) doesn't give what so ever.
>
> Josh Muckley
> S/V Sea Hawk
> 1989 C&C 37+
> Solomons, MD
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2017 10:05 AM, "Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List" <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
> James:
>
>     If you’re looking for general feedback, I’ll add my two cents.  The
> main halyard on my 42 was wire-to-rope and was led internally through an
> exit box near the base of the mast.  In my case, a winch on the deck near
> the mast was used for the main.  A few years ago we were heading out for a
> race in about 20-25 knots of breeze, started to raise the main, and the
> exit box ripped out of the mast.  Something about that 90 degree angle
> results in a lot of force.  We made a semi-permanent repair that got us
> through the season.  At the end of the season, I decided to do several
> things: 1) instead of using the old configuration, I eliminated the exit
> box and started using a mast-mounted winch that was already on the mast but
> wasn’t being used for anything (which I found curious); 2) a short distance
> above the winch, I installed a mast exit plate so the halyard would stay
> internal; and 3) I replaced the wire-to-rope halyard with a low-stretch New
> England rope.  I forget the name, but it was more high tech than Sta-Set.
> I like the new configuration, although someone needs to raise the halyard
> at the mast (which is no different than it was before but may be a drawback
> for shorthanded sailors).  The only issue I have is that the high-tech line
> is not as low-stretch as manufacturer claims, and I use the Cunningham more
> than I care to as the wind picks up.  That said, the run from the winch to
> the top of the mast is over 50 feet, so some stretch is to be expected.
> When the current halyard is retired, I will replace it with something that
> is really low stretch, and may possibly go back to wire-to-rope.
>
>     MLW
>
> *From:* Jim via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 11, 2017 10:05 PM
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Cc:* j...@mymts.net
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List new haylards
>
> Neil
> If you
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
>


-- 
Joel
301 541 8551 <(301)%20541-8551>

_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use
PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to