>OK. This stuff is over my head :-( , but at the risk of being (more) >annoying why couldn't you return this with http? > >Is the performance that much better? Is it a better architectural design? > >best, >-Rob
yes performance is much better, consider that cocoon2 is totally sax driven, so giving cocoon2 a http feed will lead to a parsing process. even with validation off this represent a huge overhead! mvh karl řie --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
