zabetak commented on a change in pull request #1157: [CALCITE-2969] Improve
design of join-like relational expressions
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1157#discussion_r279181915
##########
File path: core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/core/Join.java
##########
@@ -230,6 +237,17 @@ public boolean isSemiJoinDone() {
return false;
}
+ /**
+ * Returns whether this LogicalJoin is a semi-join but does
+ * not comes from decorrelate.
+ *
+ * @return true if this is semi but without correlate variables.
+ */
+ public boolean isNonCorrelateSemiJoin() {
+ return (this.variablesSet == null || this.variablesSet.size() == 0)
+ && joinType == JoinRelType.SEMI;
+ }
Review comment:
Thanks for the clarification @hsyuan. What I was wondering actually is if we
really use `variablesSet` in the `Join` operator? As far as I can see at least
in our test suite it is never used. If there are variables to set we currently
use only `Correlate` . So I was thinking is that if we keep both `Correlate`
and `Join` there is no reason to have `variablesSet` in the `Join` operator.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
