SEZ9 commented on PR #11648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11648#issuecomment-5385642186

   Thanks @loustler — the split plan looks good to me, and it's a nice outcome 
that this PR is no longer a breaking change once the shade module (and the 
`seatunnel-hadoop3-3.1.4-uber` → `seatunnel-hadoop3-3.4.3-uber` rename) drops 
out of scope.
   
   Remaining items before this can move forward:
   
   1. Please rebase once the 3.4.3 shade artifacts are published to Central, 
since this PR can't build until then.
   2. During the rebase, drop the `incompatible-changes.md` entry that only 
documented the rename, and confirm nothing else remaining in scope still 
qualifies as a breaking change — as @DanielLeens noted, nothing obvious does, 
but worth double-checking.
   3. Since @DanielLeens's earlier approval on `5799a570` covered the pre-split 
head, a fresh review will be needed on the rebased PR — please ping us when 
it's ready.
   
   I can't speak to the shade release turnaround myself; that question is best 
raised with the seatunnel-shade maintainers. Thanks for keeping this 
well-scoped!
   
   <!-- streview-comment:485 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to