DanielLeens commented on PR #12904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12904#issuecomment-6557464210

   Thanks @wgzhao; the full per-item response is visible on the GitHub page. It 
matches the unchanged head and my preceding approval. For @SEZ9's remaining 
pointers: F1/F3 cover all four EN/ZH REST sections, including the deprecated v2 
header at `rest-api-v2.md:741` and its unknown-id example at `:813`; F5's 
user-supplied-id 404 wording is separate from submit-and-poll; F6/F8 retain the 
populated page on refresh failure and display the looked-up id; F7 raises 
TypeError for a non-dict response rather than reporting that the job is absent.
   
   The two extra polling sequences are still optional hardening, not newly 
reopened blockers. Build and the Python checks remain green. I agree with the 
existing approval intent; Daniel's source clearance is unchanged, and no second 
full source review is being issued on this head.
   
   Checked 2026-11-01T11:42:39.168333+00:00; unchanged head 
`4cfc9b02bfee4a326e042b79e53b7bcfe1fad857`, base `dev`; compare `diverged`, 
ahead 2 / behind 33; merge `clean` / `CLEAN`; review decision `APPROVED`. 
Behind/diverged is recorded independently and does not itself request a sync. 
Daniel has READ repository permission.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to