Hi Arsene, At 03:12 AM 14-04-2018, Arsene Tungali wrote:
To be honest, i have never requested any IP resources so i am limited in my knowledge of what type of personal information is requested when someone is requesting resources from Afrinic. I would therefore appreciate to be directed to the RIPE NCC report mentionned in that communication.
There is a document about the RIPE NCC implementation at https://labs.ripe.net/Members/Athina/how-we-re-implementing-the-gdpr
Just a general question as i am following discussions on the GDPR but mostly from the naming community perspectives (being a domain name registrant): what impact does the Interim Models (with regards to the whois system and personal data and icann's compliance with GDPR) suggested by ICANN has on the numbering community? I haven't see any discussion on those models here since, from my understanding, Afrinic is just another data controller?
To keep our email exchange easy, I'll keep the Interim Models proposed by ICANN separate from the what the RIR in Africa has to do to comply with the data protection law. Afrinic Ltd was registered as a controller under the Data Protection Act 2004 (Mauritius) [1] since several years. The data protection framework to which it is subject has been aligned with the data protection framework for countries in the European Union since 2016. There are some advantages to that, e.g. the company can "borrow" some ideas from RIPE NCC instead of starting from scratch.
The difference between domain names and number resources is that number resources are usually registered to legal entities. Here is an example:
netnum: 196.216.2.0 - 196.216.3.255 netname: AFRINIC descr: AfriNIC - Internal Use country: ZA org: ORG-AFNC1-AFRINIC Regards, S. Moonesamy 1. The current data protection framework is the Data Protection Act 2017. _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
