On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I thought this was for Apache only jars. Just a place for projects to > > place there "Released jars" as a compliment to the zip and qz > > distributions. So there should be no license issues. > > Well, I'm still waiting to hear about some of this. From Dion's review, he > mentioned to me that he believes that the ASF license requires each project > to include a copy of the license, with the project name, for each ASF > licensed jar that it uses. Not just one blanket copy for all. This can be easily validated by having a certain file name strucutre. Another reason to keep them separate is that occasionally a license file will -also- reference some other license (when some BSD/MIT piece of code was imported) or an acknowledgement. These are unique to a project. So one license file per granule makes sense. Dw --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
