Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Nick Chalko wrote:
So I am for
/projectname/[subproject]/[version]/file[-version].jar
That leo suggested.
I'm not sure that's what Leo suggested.
The [] imply optional. But my main point is Centipede will adapt to whatever Apache uses.
I agree that it is easier to have the download tool match what is in use.
Having the version in both dir and jar seems a bit too much. The common
practice in many projects ( at least in jakarta ) is to use jakarta-SUBPROJECT-version for packages and dirs in the dist. Changing that would be quite painfull - and require a lot of work.
Getting the version number in the jars names is not easy either - it require changing build files, docs, scripts, maybe manifests. But it can be done, if it is clear that this is indeed an informed choice.
Having one format in the repo and one in the official releases is IMO
the worst choice. A download tool that is flexible and can support both
formats - and eventually a descriptor that maps the type of names - is easier and require less work than changing all projects.
As long as ther version is the project and version are noted somewhere. I am fine.
Costin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nick Chalko Show me the code.
Centipede
Ant + autodownloadable build plugins + needed jars autodownload.
http://krysalis.org/centipede
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
