-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:54, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> >> Actually, all it takes to veto a change is one PMC member to cast a -1 with >> a technical justification. The issue is how a community deals with those >> vetos, and how progress can be made by resolving them. > > So, please bring to the table a particular case, since I fail to recall any > such veto being ignored and/or not worked on to be resolved, other than the > mentioned Leo Simons' (was he even PMC at the time? still not ignored.) one, > which got caught up in a larger mess. Out of simple curiousity, what would this accomplish? I am not being flip. It seems clear that there are aspects on which all the players are unlikely to ever agree, so this would seem likely to prolong the vocal non-agreement. The Avalon project has been shut down; parts have moved outside the ASF and are under active development there. What is there that requires that this become the Thread That Wouldn't Die, and why? If there's a reasonable reason, cool. Otherwise, maybe we can move on. There'll be no 'winner' here. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQcegXZrNPMCpn3XdAQHPTQP/cMGXabvnlqzYZvLjkHpZFhf1+gGiwph1 ZuvXJ5/UYnPq+hWt4RRqnLeBl0SC7JMLN9WXzGc/HZYaQ5k3qBN8B8JLZyGkH1Om z+wRbO/Zy7YswvyJ4vIg4xlHut0OXef+Sx7ePFSUQ0T3OAeIflhI+o9Gs5GaMERu idtb9YAB5No= =fxy0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
