On Apr 23, 2012 3:20 PM, "Greg Stein" <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012 2:21 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> >...
> >
> > In theory, the fuzzy end-time could be abused on a contentious VOTE by
> > coordinating a block of votes and having the RM terminate the VOTE
> > after those votes come in.  So perhaps VOTEs which are expected to be
> > contentious should have a fixed end-time.
> Since a release cannot be vetoed... sure, the RM could stop the vote. But
the goal is to get signatures, too, so there is no strong benefit to
stopping early.

To rephrase: there is no such thing as a "contentious release vote".


Reply via email to