On Apr 23, 2012 2:21 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> In theory, the fuzzy end-time could be abused on a contentious VOTE by
> coordinating a block of votes and having the RM terminate the VOTE
> after those votes come in.  So perhaps VOTEs which are expected to be
> contentious should have a fixed end-time.

Since a release cannot be vetoed... sure, the RM could stop the vote. But
the goal is to get signatures, too, so there is no strong benefit to
stopping early.


Reply via email to