В сообщении от Понедельник 01 декабря 2008 Christopher Barker написал(a): > Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > I can speak about both hg and git, becase I've used both of them, and even > > when I've started from hg ([1] + some development at work) for exactly the > > same reasons you mention, and used hg a lot - see e.g. [2], for me the > > clear winner is git: > > > > > > 1. git has good support on win32 too: > > http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/ > > well, a lot of Windows users (like the ones I work with) would not > consider needing Mysys or cygwin "good" Windows support.
Yes, cygwin could seem to be an overhead, but msys is very minimalistic. You can install msysgit with only one all-in-one installer which is ~ 8MB in size. > Hg has TortoiseHg, which I can't say I've used, but appears similar to > TortoisSVN which is very nice. There are also a bunch of GUI tools for > Hg, though I have no idea if any of them are any good. Yes, there is TortoiseHg. Actually my girlfriend still uses it for her document versioning (because I've taught her to use hg, back when I was using hg myself), but our experience shows that TortoiseHg has some problems (especially with e.g. unicode comments), and there are situations in which it is just more straightforward to use command line. Being said all this, Git has Git Gui and gitk too -- which are Tk/Tcl based tools to make commits, clone repos, graphically visualize history, etc.. My imho is that the quality of Git Gui and gitk is much supperiour compared to TortoiseHg. Just FYI, Kirill. _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
