> Alternatively, I wonder if there is some theoretical
> way to work it out?
> What is the most extreme example of being behind
> (either by X stones, or
> by some percentage, such as Heikki's 50% above)
I think the bias comes as MCGO needs to "finish the
game up to the last stone/point"... Killing a lot of
"stupid" stones...
Also, as MC doesn't know anything about Go except
basic rules. Some very huge "obvious" moves aren't
obvious for the engine. (potentially creating huge
number of dead stones in the way to 'proof' it to
itself)
My 2 cents
__________________________________________________
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
¡Probalo ya!
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
