If "high resolution stuff" means high definition, then bigger and faster
is a must. The storage requirements for high definition are a lot more
than for standard def, as is the processing power. "Amateur level video
work" doesn't mean that a decent level of processing/storage won't be
needed. High def pushes the current limits of professional editing systems.
Just my opinion,
Richard P.
Steve Rigby wrote:
A friend of mine is looking into a new computer for video work. I
am guessing she is making videos of some sort, probably high
resolution stuff, and is seeking something that runs at 2.66 GHz or
faster. I guess that faster is always better for video, but would she
truly require that fast a processor for what will basically be amateur
level video work?
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
