>Increases of processor speed increase processing not mathematically >but algebraically. (I may have the terms wrong but it is not 2+2+2, >it is 2x2x2)
Who told you that? Next time they tell you anything put your fingers in your ears and sing la-la-la until they go away. Due to overhead of various sorts increases have diminishing returns. So a dual processor is only 150% as effective as a single processor of the same speed. Etc., etc. ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
