Wasn't that settled by Potter Stewart who said, "I can't define it but I
know it when I see it!!" ...not many are aware it was a case of a certain
piece of film (which was shown in the supreme court chamber) ...Stewart
further added, ""and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.""

-----Original Message-----
From: b_s-wilk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: Puritans at the helm...


 > 22 public interest groups roast FCC smutless broadband plan  > By Matthew
Lasar | Published: July 29, 2008 - 08:55AM CT  >
 >   They may not agree on net neutrality or the Fairness Doctrine, but 
almost half a dozen advocacy groups from liberal to libertarian do 
concur on one issue: they hate Federal Communications Commission Chair 
Kevin Martin's proposal for a national broadband service with the porn 
filtered out.
 > "Unconstitutional and unwise," their Friday filing calls the plan, 
which they charge amounts to a "government mandated 'blacklist' of 
websites." The filtering component would limit the system "so 
dramatically that the usefulness of the service would be radically 
reduced." Plus, if the agency actually approved the scheme, it would 
face a tsunami of lawsuits.
 >
 > Read on: http://tinyurl.com/6phwoz


What's smut? What's porn?

To some of those nuts, the paintings in the Louvre, or Museum of Modern 
art are porn. So is this, 
http://www.woot.com/Forums/ViewPost.aspx?PostID=2468733 [after the 
woot-off], or http://naturist-holidays-uncovered.co.uk/naturist.htm. 
Don't forget John Ashcroft hiding Lady Liberty's boobs, like the boob 
that he is. Also some "porn filters" doesn't allow access to medical 
information about breast cancer.

First it's "porn" next it's politics, religion, important news, and who 
knows what else? The local Marantha church radio here broadcasts the 
most hateful programs I've heard in a long time. Their athletes wear 
head to toe sweats for games; cheerleaders wear sweaters and 
floor-length skirts, yet the sermons in their tent meetings [you can 
hear them in the neighborhood] are all about hate, sin, hell, damnation, 
bigotry, racism, censorship, xenophobia. Will people like this dictate 
the filters? Will the hideous people in Texas who tell textbook 
publishers what kind of censored books our children should read in 
school dictate the filters?

Those pathetic, ignorant, repressed souls can buy filters for their own 
computers, and can also take the time to study the Constitution. 
"Unconstitutional and unwise" only scratches at the surface of their 
problems!

Betty


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to