Very Very.
I think the collective cell phone company motto is, we aren't happy unless
you aren't happy.



On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I did not see that in his note sorry.  He seemed to be putting down the Wii
> which has developed a pretty good set of games to the Xbox which still has
> one in development.
>
> Sometimes it is fun sometimes it is frustrating.  The way that Cell phone
> companies play games I get very frustrated.  If I want a good phone I should
> not have it dictated to be which service I can  use.  I live in an area that
> is best served with CDMA (Verizon, Alltel has been sold off to AT&T here)
>  However if I want a Pre I have to go to Sprint?  If I want an IPhone I have
> to go to AT&T both of whose coverage in this are sucks?
>
> So what do I do?
>
> Sometimes it can be very fun and often it is just very frustrating.
>
> Stewart
>
>
>
>
> At 03:56 PM 6/3/2009, you wrote:
>
>> Well...it's kinda hard for you to start dictating the terms of the thread,
>> especially when Chris started it and in the first email it was clear he
>> was
>> talking about something not yet on the shelf.
>>
>> I personally would not compare the Wii and the Xbox, I've said before that
>> I
>> don't believe the two to be competitors.  I don't own either one..nor a
>> PS3.
>>
>> If we are only going to talk about things you can go buy now...that stops
>> any talk of anything new going on with iPhone or iPods...palm pre, any
>> number of things.  Part of the fun is talking about things that are soon
>> coming, new technology being developed, if you don't like talking about
>> it,
>> perhaps you should have stayed away from a thread that was clearly about
>> new
>> tech.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Understood but this started off by making claims for the Xbox that have
>> > since been shown to be in development.
>> >
>> > Each game platform seems to have it's endorsers and its detractors.
>> >
>> > The Wii started off as the first (or let's say the most recent)
>> interactive
>> > game console.  it continues to develop this and with new games that make
>> it
>> > a bit more interactive.  (The EA Sports description of Tiger Woods Golf
>> 10
>> > seems nice, but disappointing as it will show me what a crappy gofer I
>> > really am.)
>> >
>> > The Xbox is now developing those type of games.  However there is
>> nothing
>> > on the shelves yet.  Wii's still are flying off the shelves.
>> >
>> > Now I would not go out to buy an Xbox for those type of games.  (not my
>> > desire)  but I would buy it for Movies and an interface with some
>> > technology.
>> >
>> > Now my son-in-law has gone whole hog.  He has a game chair etc. for his
>> > Xbox.
>> >
>> > The new technology as you say is a development tool for game companies
>> to
>> > develop games from.  But it is still a development tool.
>> >
>> > When you want to make comparisons let us make comparisons to what is
>> > available off the shelf not what is development.  Otherwise you have
>> made an
>> > unequal comparison.
>> >
>> > No it is not vaporware but until it becomes a real live game on the
>> shelf
>> > it is not realware either.  I have known stuff to get stuck in
>> development
>> > for some time due to glitches and yes sometimes economy.
>> >
>> > So lets make sure we discuss real games with real games not real games
>> with
>> > games in development.
>> >
>> > Stewart
>> >
>> >
>> > At 02:56 PM 6/3/2009, you wrote:
>> >
>> >> You are starting to sound like Tom, I usually don't expect insults from
>> >> you.
>> >>   Calm down Rev..
>> >>
>> >> You said you had seen much that was vaporware, my point was that it was
>> >> already in production, already in the pipeline.  It's not been released
>> >> yet,
>> >> but it will be.   It's not a development tool, the product has been
>> >> released
>> >> to game developers so they can code for it.  That's not vaporware by
>> >> definition.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
>> > mailto:[email protected]
>> > Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
>> > Ozark, AL  SL 82
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> *************************************************************************
>> > **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
>>  **
>> > **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
>> >
>> *************************************************************************
>> >
>>
>>
>> *************************************************************************
>> **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
>> **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
>> *************************************************************************
>>
>
> Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
> mailto:[email protected]
> Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
> Ozark, AL  SL 82
>
>
> *************************************************************************
> **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
> **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
> *************************************************************************
>


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to