If an impeachment opportunity is what generates attraction, I'd be more concerned about the design of a process that gave "looters" (terrorists in disguise or mixed among looters) access to a location bubbling over with nuclear material, causing release of radioactivity and total disarray in accounting for the whereabouts of the stuff (assuming anyone knows what was there to begin with). A process that opened access to WMD to "looters" from wherever (and not just to whomever Hussein might have chosen to have them) is one that reflects bad planning or bad execution of a supposedly good plan.
In other words, there is or should be far more concern about the present location of WMD rather than whether they existed. They almost certainly existed, it is debatable whether their existence justified what happened, and so the question is where are they now and how did they get there. Jim Maule Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law Villanova PA 19085 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vls.law.vill.edu/prof/maule President, TaxJEM Inc (computer assisted tax law instruction) (www.taxjem.com) Publisher, JEMBook Publishing Co. (www.jembook.com) Owner/Developer, TaxCruncherPro (www.taxcruncherpro.com) Maule Family Archivist & Genealogist (www.maulefamily.com)
