I think we have established, constitutionally, that lying is not an impeachable offense.
At 06:28 PM 6/7/2003 -0400, you wrote: >Prof. Maule writes: >> In other words, there is or should be far more concern about the >> present location of WMD rather than whether they existed. They almost >> certainly existed, it is debatable whether their existence justified >> what happened, and so the question is where are they now and how did >> they get there. > >Comment: It was not clear to the international community and others that >WMDs existed at the time of the U.S.' invasion. Of course, they existed in >the 90s, but it was not at all clear that WMDs existed in 2002. Bush >articulated a foreign policy in 2002 justifying pre-emptive strikes on the >grounds that WMDs created a threat of imminent attack, and the Bush >Administration is now using this stick against other states (Syria, Iran, >N. Korea) to compel them to act in conformity with U.S. policy. > >Francisco Forrest Martin > Frank Cross Herbert D. Kelleher Centennial Professor of Business Law CBA 5.202 University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712
