On 10 Oct 2000, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > If you notice we have the flag and not [CHRPM] and not [FROZEN-CHRPM] > that mean it for cooker not for frozen install. Still a bad idea. See my previous posts. I have objected to putting 'broken' stuff in Cooker before. Just because it's an experimental distribution doesn't mean I want it broken (since I use it on a day-to-day basis). -- Sincerely, David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Fernando Monera
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Ron Stodden
- [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Warren Doney
