David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Still a bad idea. See my previous posts. I have objected to putting > 'broken' stuff in Cooker before. Just because it's an experimental > distribution doesn't mean I want it broken (since I use it on a day-to-day > basis). And how do you want we develop if we don't put expermimental stuff, do you want we uograde 200 Package compiler kernel at the same time ? -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org Paris, France --Chmouel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Fernando Monera
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Ron Stodden
- [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Warren Doney
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Alexander Skwar
