On 11 Oct 2000, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yep, everything except the most important part: the kernel. > > The kernel can compile with these patches : > [...] OK, but the kernel should not have to be patched in order to compile. What's more, the result is unpredictable. And having to redefine such basic functions makes me seriously doubt about the compiler consistency! -- Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk (note on optimi... Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Fernando Monera
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Yoann Vandoorselaere
