Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > seems like redhat managed to build their full distro with it, so C++ is not dead > broke. We tried once already to put gcc 2.96 but it broke too much to be kept. > If this new gcc 2.96 (with redhat's patch) still breaks a lot of things, it's > going to be removed for sure! The main problem was the compiler didn't compile really good the kernel and i didn't want to do the tricky thing with the kernel and egcs like redhat does. But most of the code should be compiled or if it didn't we should fix it, period. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org Paris, France --Chmouel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Fernando Monera
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
