Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96

[Chmouel Boudjnah]

Francis Galiegue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> OK, but the kernel should not have to be patched in order to
> compile. 

Do you think the kernel-1.2 can still be compiled with gcc2.95 ? A old kernel
should be updated, that is...

> What's  more, the result is unpredictable. And having to redefine
> such basic functions makes me seriously doubt about the compiler
> consistency!

We redefine the functions like we does for kernel-2.4 so we don't
redefine for fix to compile with our new compiler we redefine it to
fix them at short.. 

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inc                     http://www.chmouel.org
Paris, France                                     --Chmouel