On 25. máj 2002 o 15:08, Ben Reser wrote:

> On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Tibor Pittich wrote:
> > yes, sure, but there is anothers unintelligibles dependencies in
> > mandrake distribution.
> > i don't want start flamewar, but for example krb5-libs is needed if i
> > want using standard telnet, or ftp client.
> > krb5-libs size is 972515 bytes, and 54375 bytes has perl-Razor-Agent,
> > and krb5-libs is not useful on non-kerberized network.. but i know,
> > these clients has compilled in support for kerberos..
> > i repeat, spamassassin is more dependent at razor-agent as not, IMHO:)

> WRONG!  krb5-libs is required because telnet is built with kerbose
> support.  Actually it's the kerbose telnet client.  You have two
> choices.  Include a telnet client that supports kerbose or don't.

no, i don't have two choices. if i want use only binaries and don't want
rebuild telnet or ftp package, i _must_ have installed kerberos libs
too. i know, this is offtopic on this thread, but how many percent users
use kerberos authentication ? if you can reply to this, please change
topic.

> if you want to that depency is a requirement there is nothing you can do.
> If you remove the krb5-libs dependency (which you really can't since rpm
> adds it automatically for you) then telnet won't work at all.
> 
> If you remove the Razor Requires for spamassassin then spamassassin
> continues to function.  spamassassin works just fine without Razor.

is this anywhere strictly defined as it is interpreting by you?
i read mdk-rpm howto and maximum-rpm doc, but there is no allusion that
this field is dedicated to telling which package is _mandatory_.

> Your assertion that it doesn't work right is baloney.  

<b>i don't wrote</b> that spamassassin won't work without razor-agent.
i wrote only that spamassassin works much _better_. i know, my english
is very bad, but i believe that this my idea was comprehended clearly.

> This isn't about disk space usage.  It's about dependcies being right.
> By including the depency you're forcing everyone who wants to use the
> rpm of spamassassin to use Razor.

it is configurable.. or you can use --nodeps. look at my example about
krb5-libs. it is not configurable and i MUST have kerberos libs.

> There can be good reasons not to use Razor.  For instance using Razor
> will cause certain emails to automatically be submitted to the Razor
> database by default.  In some jurisdictions dislosure of customer emails
> to 3rd parties could be considered illegal.

but this is not problem in razor agent ;) this problem related to
default config file. imho, better is disable this functionality by
default. on this point you have right.

> Again there is no technical reason as there is with telnet and krb5-libs
> to have the Requires so it shouldn't be there.

fundamentally question is: where is authoritative description about
"Requires" and what tells about it. if it exists and you have right in
your interpretation, and my lobbing about "Requires" for spamassassin and
razor-agent , please sorry for my mail and don't throb my head :) i was
thinking, that this forum is right place for discusion about this.

-- 
Linux 2.4.18-16mdk
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586 
12:27am up 3 days, 13:07, 5 users, load average: 0.03, 0.02, 0.00 

Attachment: msg64734/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to