cpan-workers  

Messages by Date

• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 Ask Bjørn Hansen
• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 Adam Kennedy
• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 David Golden
• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 David Golden
• 2010/01/05 Re: CPAN vs Perl 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/05 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN brian d foy
• 2010/01/05 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Steffen Mueller
• 2010/01/05 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN brian d foy
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN David Golden
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Adam Kennedy
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Adam Kennedy
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN brian d foy
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Geoffrey Broadwell
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Jesse Vincent
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Zefram
• 2010/01/04 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Ovid
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN David E. Wheeler
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Andreas J. Koenig
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Adam Kennedy
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Ask Bjørn Hansen
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Jesse Vincent
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN David Golden
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN brian d foy
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Ricardo Signes
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Andreas J. Koenig
• 2010/01/03 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/02 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Adam Kennedy
• 2010/01/02 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Eric Wilhelm
• 2010/01/02 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Adam Kennedy
• 2010/01/02 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN David Golden
• 2010/01/02 Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN Ruslan Zakirov
• 2010/01/02 Perl 6 versus the CPAN Ovid
• 2009/12/16 Re: optional_features key names Barbie
• 2009/12/16 Re: optional_features key names David Golden
• 2009/12/16 Re: optional_features key names Barbie
• 2009/12/15 Re: optional_features key names Zefram
• 2009/12/15 Re: optional_features key names David Golden
• 2009/12/15 optional_features key names Barbie
• 2009/12/05 External dependencies once again (a repost from my blog) Zbigniew Lukasiak
• 2009/12/05 Re: A matching distroprefs appears to corrupt future calls to install() Andreas J. Koenig
• 2009/12/03 Re: A matching distroprefs appears to corrupt future calls to install() brian d foy
• 2009/12/03 Re: A matching distroprefs appears to corrupt future calls to install() brian d foy
• 2009/12/02 Re: A matching distroprefs appears to corrupt future calls to install() Andreas J. Koenig
• 2009/12/01 Re: A matching distroprefs appears to corrupt future calls to install() brian d foy
• 2009/12/01 A matching distroprefs appears to corrupt future calls to install() brian d foy
• 2009/11/22 Extending timeline for CPAN Meta Spec 2.0 David Golden
• 2009/11/20 Integrating cpan(1) into CPAN.pm for perl 5.12 and beyond brian d foy
• 2009/11/04 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/04 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/04 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/11/04 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Cantrell
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features Shlomi Fish
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Zefram
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Ricardo Signes
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Cantrell
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Cantrell
• 2009/11/03 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash David Cantrell
• 2009/11/03 CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Mark Fowler
• 2009/11/02 Re: CPAN Meta Spec Proposal discussion period has ended -- summary of results David Golden
• 2009/11/02 Re: CPAN Meta Spec Proposal discussion period has ended -- summary of results Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CPAN Meta Spec Proposal discussion period has ended -- summary of results David Golden
• 2009/11/02 Re: CPAN Meta Spec Proposal discussion period has ended -- summary of results Ricardo Signes
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 05. Schema Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 33. Install Meta files and make them queryable Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CPAN Meta Spec Proposal discussion period has ended -- summary of results Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features David E. Wheeler
• 2009/11/02 Re: CPAN Meta Spec Proposal discussion period has ended -- summary of results Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 29. Language Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 16. Binary Package Dependencies Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 13. Add a post_depends set Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 08. Extensibly Group Prereqs Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 15. Add development_requires Adam Kennedy
• 2009/11/02 CPAN Meta Spec Proposal discussion period has ended -- summary of results David Golden
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Barbie
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Cantrell
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features David Golden
• 2009/11/02 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features Zbigniew Lukasiak
• 2009/11/01 CMSP -- prerequisites omnibus David Golden
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 06. Data structures, not YAML Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 06. Data structures, not YAML David Golden
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 33. Install Meta files and make them queryable Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 22. Clarify author field Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash David Golden
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 16. Binary Package Dependencies Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 11. OS/arch/platform-specific requirements Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 06. Data structures, not YAML Slaven Rezic
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 06. Data structures, not YAML David Golden
• 2009/11/01 Re: CMSP 06. Data structures, not YAML Slaven Rezic
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 05. Schema Slaven Rezic
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Ricardo Signes
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 27. Long description David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 05. Schema David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 04. Formalize allowed version number formats David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 31. Version changes Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 30. Trove-Like Categories Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 27. Long description Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 26. Specify a DLSIP resource Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 25. Controlling test suite runs Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 22. Clarify author field Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 20. Make bugtracker resource a hash Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 19. Make repository resource a hash Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 15. Add development_requires Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 22. Clarify author field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 12. Allow Sequences (Arrays) for Prereqs Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 11. OS/arch/platform-specific requirements Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 10. Add a free-text prerequisite field Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 09. Clarify intent of 'recommends' and add 'suggests' Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 08. Extensibly Group Prereqs Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 06. Data structures, not YAML Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 05. Schema Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 30. Trove-Like Categories David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 04. Formalize allowed version number formats Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 33. Install Meta files and make them queryable David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 03. Deprecate YAML Tiny dialect for JSON David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 27. Long description David Golden
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 03. Deprecate YAML Tiny dialect for JSON Barbie
• 2009/10/31 Re: CMSP 04. Formalize allowed version number formats David Golden
• 2009/10/30 RE: CMSP 22. Clarify author field Jan Dubois
• 2009/10/30 Re: CMSP 22. Clarify author field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/10/30 Re: CMSP 22. Clarify author field David Golden
• 2009/10/30 Re: CMSP 22. Clarify author field Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ
• 2009/10/30 Re: CMSP 18. Make dynamic_config mandatory David Golden
• 2009/10/29 CMSP -- updated summary of all proposals David Golden
• 2009/10/29 CPAN Meta Spec Proposals -- only a couple more days for public comment David Golden
• 2009/10/22 Re: CMSP 16. Binary Package Dependencies Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/22 Re: CMSP 16. Binary Package Dependencies David Cantrell
• 2009/10/22 Re: CMSP 16. Binary Package Dependencies David Golden
• 2009/10/22 CMSP 16. Binary Package Dependencies Zbigniew Lukasiak
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 07. Enhance granularity of prerequisites Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 33. Install Meta files and make them queryable Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 23. Have a "development version" flag Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 20. Make bugtracker resource a hash Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 07. Enhance granularity of prerequisites David Golden
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 07. Enhance granularity of prerequisites Chris Weyl
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 09. Clarify intent of 'recommends' and add 'suggests' Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 09. Clarify intent of 'recommends' and add 'suggests' Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/13 Re: CMSP 07. Enhance granularity of prerequisites Damyan Ivanov
• 2009/10/12 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David E. Wheeler
• 2009/10/12 Re: CMSP 34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use Zefram
• 2009/10/12 Re: CMSP 34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use David Golden
• 2009/10/12 Re: CMSP 34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use Zefram
• 2009/10/11 Re: ENOMAIL Barbie
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 29. Language Tim Bunce
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Chris Weyl
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Ricardo Signes
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Ricardo Signes
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Mark Fowler
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 16. Binary Package Dependencies Tony Cook
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/10/11 Re: ENOMAIL Ask Bjørn Hansen
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Chris Weyl
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Ruslan Zakirov
• 2009/10/11 Re: ENOMAIL David Golden
• 2009/10/11 ENOMAIL Barbie
• 2009/10/11 CMSP 33. Install Meta files and make them queryable Chris Weyl
• 2009/10/11 CMSP 04. Formalize allowed version number formats Chris Weyl
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 29. Language Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Ruslan Zakirov
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David E. Wheeler
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 29. Language Ruslan Zakirov
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 29. Language David Golden
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 29. Language Zefram
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David Golden
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 26. Specify a DLSIP resource Zefram
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field Zefram
• 2009/10/11 Re: CMSP 21. Formalize optional_features Zefram
• 2009/10/10 Re: CMSP 17. Better formalization of license field David E. Wheeler

• Earlier messages
• Later messages