Achille, maybe you have a more recent draft version - the one being reviewed by Steve for some time now - which might be more useful to Christian-Emil than the outdated one publicly available. If so, you could send it directly to him (and not to the list).
Franco Prof. Franco Niccolucci Director, VAST-LAB PIN - U. of Florence Scientific Coordinator ARIADNE - ARIADNEplus - PARTHENOS Editor-in-Chief ACM Journal of Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) Piazza Ciardi 25 59100 Prato, Italy > Il giorno 18 set 2018, alle ore 14:51, Achille Felicetti > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Dear Christian-Emil, > > As you might have guessed, CMRarchaeo’s documentation is still a work in > progress and many efforts are currently taking place to improve and finalise > it. In particular, version 1.4.5 has already been extended with new real > cases and examples, and many scope notes have been revised and discussed > during one of last SIGs and added to the document. > > Steve is kindly revising latest version of the document and we are waiting > for him to release it in order to publish it on CIDOC-CRM website and move > forward towards next revision steps. > > In parallel, we are also working on scope notes for properties and on > revising superproperties, which are still missing in current version. > > It would be a pleasure for us if you would like to join the team and help us > in improving CRMarchaeo documentation: all your reviews and comments could be > sent directly to me. > > Thank you for reporting on this task. > > Best regards, > Achille > >> Il giorno 18 set 2018, alle ore 13:21, Christian-Emil Smith Ore >> <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> >> >> Dear all, >> I participate in an archeological infrastructure project (financed by the >> Norwegian Research Council) for data from archaeological excavations in >> Norway. The objectives is to link datasets form excavations, museum >> collections and archives. My task is to plan the use of CIDOC-CRM and >> possibly CRMArcheo as semantic glue. >> >> In Norway the Swedish system Intrasis (http://www.intrasis.com/) is a de >> facto standard and most excavations use the same template. >> >> My assumption is that the information in an intrasis-instance can easily be >> mapped to CRM/CRMArcheo. To verify this I have started a close reading of >> CRMArcheo. To my surprise, the CRMArcheo( 1.4.5) is more unfinished than I >> had got the impression of. I will not go in detail here, just mention a few >> deficits; Properties Ap8 to AP21 have no examples. Scope note of A6 is >> formulated as one single sentence 9 lines long and not ending in a full >> stop. Many examples refer to illustrations in literature, a few are shown >> in the beginning but the rest can only be found in the literature >> >> Is there a CRMArcheo team I can send my review? >> >> Best, >> Christian-Emil >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Crm-sig mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
