Dear Franco, Sure :-))
Done! A. > Il giorno 18 set 2018, alle ore 15:04, Franco Niccolucci > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Achille, > > maybe you have a more recent draft version - the one being reviewed by Steve > for some time now - which might be more useful to Christian-Emil than the > outdated one publicly available. If so, you could send it directly to him > (and not to the list). > > Franco > > Prof. Franco Niccolucci > Director, VAST-LAB > PIN - U. of Florence > Scientific Coordinator > ARIADNE - ARIADNEplus - PARTHENOS > Editor-in-Chief > ACM Journal of Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) > > Piazza Ciardi 25 > 59100 Prato, Italy > >> Il giorno 18 set 2018, alle ore 14:51, Achille Felicetti >> <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> >> Dear Christian-Emil, >> >> As you might have guessed, CMRarchaeo’s documentation is still a work in >> progress and many efforts are currently taking place to improve and finalise >> it. In particular, version 1.4.5 has already been extended with new real >> cases and examples, and many scope notes have been revised and discussed >> during one of last SIGs and added to the document. >> >> Steve is kindly revising latest version of the document and we are waiting >> for him to release it in order to publish it on CIDOC-CRM website and move >> forward towards next revision steps. >> >> In parallel, we are also working on scope notes for properties and on >> revising superproperties, which are still missing in current version. >> >> It would be a pleasure for us if you would like to join the team and help us >> in improving CRMarchaeo documentation: all your reviews and comments could >> be sent directly to me. >> >> Thank you for reporting on this task. >> >> Best regards, >> Achille >> >>> Il giorno 18 set 2018, alle ore 13:21, Christian-Emil Smith Ore >>> <[email protected]> ha scritto: >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> I participate in an archeological infrastructure project (financed by the >>> Norwegian Research Council) for data from archaeological excavations in >>> Norway. The objectives is to link datasets form excavations, museum >>> collections and archives. My task is to plan the use of CIDOC-CRM and >>> possibly CRMArcheo as semantic glue. >>> >>> In Norway the Swedish system Intrasis (http://www.intrasis.com/) is a de >>> facto standard and most excavations use the same template. >>> >>> My assumption is that the information in an intrasis-instance can easily be >>> mapped to CRM/CRMArcheo. To verify this I have started a close reading of >>> CRMArcheo. To my surprise, the CRMArcheo( 1.4.5) is more unfinished than I >>> had got the impression of. I will not go in detail here, just mention a few >>> deficits; Properties Ap8 to AP21 have no examples. Scope note of A6 is >>> formulated as one single sentence 9 lines long and not ending in a full >>> stop. Many examples refer to illustrations in literature, a few are shown >>> in the beginning but the rest can only be found in the literature >>> >>> Is there a CRMArcheo team I can send my review? >>> >>> Best, >>> Christian-Emil >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Crm-sig mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Crm-sig mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig >
