"Balestrieri, Francesco" <[email protected]> writes:
> I believe QA was waiting to complete the migration before announcing > the move. This looks backwards: it would make much more sense to announce the move _before_ doing it, and also explain why JIRA was chosen over GitHub and when the migration would take place. > QA will report bugs in Jira, and we will be asking community members > and anybody else who has a bug for Crosswalk to do the same. Obviously > it's easier to use a single tracker tool, but if anybody finds Github > useful for e.g. task tracking, there is nothing preventing that. I'd rather not have a murky situation in which some bugs end up in GitHub and others in JIRA, and the same happens to tasks and other things. Whether we agree that all bug reports go into JIRA and only JIRA or GitHub is orthogonal, what I would realy like is for everyone to agree on a single solution now and start updating whatever documentation needs to be updated. _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
