In tech I learnt how valuable a mail filter can be. 

Robert

On Thursday 16 February 2006 08:08, Java Mad wrote:
> You not getting the point Doc....
>   what im saying at technikons they dont teach you technologies
>   They teach you to FIND THE PROBLEMS AND FIX THE PROBLEMS firstly
>   How to design software using psuedo, flowchart, ERD, Nazzi Sneiderman
> Charts the works.... looking at program flow.... analysing problems
>
>   and then we use these skills we learned there and proving it right with
> Different Technologies Which therefore expose you to different
> languages....
>   That that means that you can relate to ne language for example
>   its Syntax.... becos i was exposed in my first year in Pascal
>   i found the syntax easy in VB but didnt understand the concept of VB
>   when i understood VB i found it easy do develop in JavaScript
>   wheter it is for the Netscape or IE or other browser DOM using DHTML;
>
>   Becos i also did and proved and solved solution in C i found object
> orientation programming in JAVA, C++ easy becos of syntax and style....
>
>   Thats what i was saying... we are more TECHNICALLY EQUIPPED i.e
>   - promblem identifications, solutions and research
>   - using different tools to solve problems
>   - we think at the end-of-the-day-like-a-machine
>
> "Dr Heinz M. Kabutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>       I think that the greatest benefit of university is that you get your
> arrogance hit out of you in the first semester....
>
>   Kind regards from
>
> Heinz
> --
> Dr. Heinz M. Kabutz (Maximum Solutions)
> Sun Java Champion
> Author of "The Java(tm) Specialists' Newsletter"
> <http://www.javaspecialists.co.za/>
> Tel: +27 (83) 340-5633
>     -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Java Mad Sent: 16 February 2006 09:23
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [CTJUG Forum] Re: Java Developer needed
>
>
>   You see there Heinz!
> Nicely said Fritz....
>   So we from tech and college are more marketable....
>   plus dont eva say that the point of learning to learn is to learn yorself
>
>   neway...You see the difference what i think between Universities and
> Technikon,Colleges is this
>
>   Universities : Go there and just do THEORY,RESEARCH pass get degreed
>                       and be a zero when you find a job......
>                       Now when you get the job... you find it difficult to
> relate to programming And get a easy job.... become an Analyst or Project
> Manager
>
>   Technikons/Colleges : Now they are the WORKING HORSES of the INDUSTRY
>                                    he you go and they teach or you learn
>                                    THEORY,PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES, RESEARCH,
>                                    and yes im doing research in my BTECH
> year. get an National Diploma enter the marketplace And be a BOMB why...
> becos we were thought to FIND THE SOLUTION AND TO FIX THE PROBLEM, NOT TO
> DO RESEARCH ON WHY THE PROBLEM EXIST. and afer a while we become
> ANALYST/DEV or more so PROJ MAN
>
>   GMail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>           Dear Java Mad,
>
>   I am just starting my honours degree in ComSci at UCT; no they didn't
> ever teach us HTML or any scripting language as part of our 3 year
> undergraduate degree, but yes, they expected us to use them. As for AWT and
> Swing, we got about a week of teaching on them in first year, and since
> then we have had to use them in various projects. All the other web-based
> stuff, well, we spent about six weeks on the theory, and then had to do a
> (admittedly small) project that put it all into practise.
>
>   The point of a Comsci degree does not appear to be to learn about
> technologies. It instead seems to be "learning how to learn". I don't think
> there is anyone who graduated with me last year who does not know how to
> program; but we would (will) all have to spend some time getting to our
> feet in the marketplace. Give them two months to get to grips with the
> things they haven't seen before, and the skills they learned at University
> will prove far more useful than having spent three years boning up on the
> super-practical stuff you are talking about.
>
>   Regards,
>   Fritz Meissner
>
>   PS. This is not to say that these skills cannot be learned outside of
> university. Merely to say that there is a point to what I've spent the last
> three years of my life doing ;-).
>
>
>     I said {
>            better in theory and research yes;
>            met up with a guy from university in a web development
> environment and he struggle to find out how JSP work let again didnt even
> know ne HTML well my side i was thought a whole lot of practical stuff like
> HTML,Java, Applets, ASP ("oops")
>            and from ASP i could relate to JSP
>           and from Applets i could relate to Servlets
>
>           so what do they teach at Universities
>
>          public static void main(String[] args) {
>            System.out.prinln("i will geuss");
>          }
>
>         // probs the apps that run in a DOS window
>        // or do they teach AWT and SWING stuff
>
>       so please tell me that
>
>           }
> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMO, passing comsci at University level is not a necessary nor a
> sufficient condition for making one a good programmer.
>
> I can remember at Uni (I went to Natal-Durban), I used to cringe when
> we were assigned group work, because I knew that most of the work would
> be done by a few because the rest just wouldn't
> ---------------------------------
>   Yahoo! Mail
> Use Photomail to share photos without annoying
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! Mail
>  Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CTJUG Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to