At 18:41 -1000 7/23/00, Reese wrote:
>At 08:49 PM 23/07/00 -0700, Kevin Elliott wrote:
>>At 20:34 -0400 7/23/00, Greg Vassie wrote:
>>>On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 09:55:08AM -1000, Reese wrote:
>>>Japan may not have the US constitution, but their current constitution
>>>was written by the US government in 1946. The American concepts of
>>>civil rights are most definitely a part of the Japanese constitution.
>>>For those who may be interested:
>>
>>LOL!!! Oh my Reese that is a bit embarrassing- just based on a short skim of
>>http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/law/xr00005_.html#62 it looks like it is
>>unconstitutional! Well isn't that amusing.
>
>The yoke's on you, son, read the Chinese constitution I posted a link to.
And your point is? Japan's constitution is presumed to have much
more meaning and force than the official charter of a Communist
enclave. Additionally as a closer friend of the United States it can
be assumed that our opinion of their actions carries more force. You
fight the battles you can win.
--
Kevin "The Cubbie" Elliott
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ#23758827
_______________________________________________________________________________
"As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both
instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly
unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be most aware
of change in the air--however slight--lest we become unwitting
victims of the darkness."
-- Justice William O. Douglas
