On Saturday 07 January 2006 18:48, Eric Kow wrote: > Thanks for your feedback, all! > > I agree that darcs is already pretty easy to use from a command line. > But what I had in mind when I mentioned a graphical interface was not > so much ease-of-use (which would be nice, of course), but > *convenience*. > > Maybe there are things that work better in a GUI than with the console > interface? For example, > 1. a patch dependency visualiser > 2. an iTunes-like interface to patches (click on the 'author' column, > and you see the patches sorted by author, for example) > 3. click on a patch and you get some subtle feedback on all the patches > it depends on (for example, they change colour) > 4. maybe some kind of help resolving conflicts? (no clear ideas)
sounds great :-) > > That being said, there are likely more pressing issues on the bug > tracker to be worked on, so unless somebody actually expresses an > interest in this, I guess I'll let the issue drop (or maybe dabble > around a bit on my side) :-) > I'm interested in :-) And I'd be happy to help (if I can found some time to do so)
pgpcgMoZui3Dl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
