On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:06:47 +0000, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: >> Pushing patches may be a good time to do it, but then that doesn't >> allow much time for discussion, so I guess it's really up to the >> reviewer (in this case me, sorry) to make sure it's OK and post an >> announcement. > > FWIW I think the policy should be that it's up to the patch author to do > this, and the reviewer to check that the patch author hasn't forgotten > anything. [This isn't a criticism of anyone, just a thought about what we > should aim for in future.]
Good. I've updated http://wiki.darcs.net/Development/Policy#dependencies I feel a little silly because this seems like too much of a corner case to be stuffing our policies documentation, but I guess overdocumentation is a lesser evil than underdocumentation. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
