On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Reinier Lamers <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Petr, > > Op vrijdag 25 december 2009 20:23 schreef Petr Rockai: > > Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes: > > > Reinier and I agree that the Unicode stuff can go in later (eg. Darcs > > > 2.5) rather than sooner (Darcs 2.4), so rest assured there is no > > > pressure and we can roll this stuff back before the freeze if we really > > > need to. > > could I maybe plea to not have rollbacks and rollbacks-of-rollbacks and > > instead just obliterate the problematic patch(es) in the release branch? > > We should just fight it out properly on HEAD (i.e. patch this into a > > form that is sustainable). > > That's a good idea, and it's what I am going to do as the release manager. > I'm okay with new patches or rollbacks. May I ask why there is a preference for regular patches? Thanks, Jason
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
