Hi, Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes: > Reinier and I agree that the Unicode stuff can go in later (eg. Darcs > 2.5) rather than sooner (Darcs 2.4), so rest assured there is no > pressure and we can roll this stuff back before the freeze if we really > need to. could I maybe plea to not have rollbacks and rollbacks-of-rollbacks and instead just obliterate the problematic patch(es) in the release branch? We should just fight it out properly on HEAD (i.e. patch this into a form that is sustainable).
Thanks, Petr. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
