Hi all, Op zaterdag 26 december 2009 07:56 schreef je: > Jason Dagit <[email protected]> writes: > > I'm okay with new patches or rollbacks. May I ask why there is a preference > > for regular patches? > Because we want to improve the compatibility of the feature, not simply > remove it. (Hard to achieve with rollbacks.)
Yes. And because I wouldn't want to clutter the repository with lot of rollbacks and unrollbacks before we have a clear idea of where to go from here. It appears that everyone agrees that the UTF-8 metadata is OK, but needs some minor tweaks (adding UTF-8 tags or forgetting about storing all UTF-8 normalized to NFC). On the one hand, one could say that I committed these patches too early. On the other hand, the patches have been up for review for a month or so and only committing got the debate started. Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
