Hi Petr,

Op vrijdag 25 december 2009 20:23 schreef Petr Rockai:
> Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes:
> > Reinier and I agree that the Unicode stuff can go in later (eg. Darcs
> > 2.5) rather than sooner (Darcs 2.4), so rest assured there is no
> > pressure and we can roll this stuff back before the freeze if we really
> > need to.
> could I maybe plea to not have rollbacks and rollbacks-of-rollbacks and
> instead just obliterate the problematic patch(es) in the release branch?
> We should just fight it out properly on HEAD (i.e. patch this into a
> form that is sustainable).

That's a good idea, and it's what I am going to do as the release manager.

Reinier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to