As have been a lot of my replies today... I do not do things blindly, I work with lossy on purpose and have my reasons which have worked well for me for over 5 years now.
but whilst everyone has now decided to point blame at the dng format I think we can stop this thread. As I hoped to learn more about DT, not dng. DT, clearly needs to find simpler solutions to its not so simple/effecient highlight recovery/reconstruction workflow. Most of my searching lead to blogs with this being the biggest complaint. Chris On Sun, 08 Apr 2018, 23:12 Michael Rasmussen <m...@miras.org> wrote: > Two important things concerning the DNG*) format: > 1) Lossless is an option > 2) The DNG format also specifies a non-raw format called Linear DNG. > See http://www.barrypearson.co.uk/articles/dng/linear.htm > > If any of the above is in actual play then your results are to be > expected. > > *) https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/digital-negative.html > > -- > Hilsen/Regards > Michael Rasmussen > > Get my public GnuPG keys: > michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E > mir <at> datanom <dot> net > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C > mir <at> miras <dot> org > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > /usr/games/fortune -es says: > Yow! Now I get to think about all the BAD THINGS I did to a BOWLING > BALL when I was in JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL! > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org