* Chris <[email protected]> [04-08-18 21:22]: > Fascinating! So dt is clipping somewhere somehow, or the dng format > 'pro' adobe somehow? :p > > So, just taking this further and assuming the detail I was looking for > was in the red channel.. I was able to desaturate the reds... but > obviously this would not work if I had someone wearing red in the > photograph. Proof that the detail exists though, albeit in an odd > channel for clouds. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/slbor6tg6ymzd73/darkt_07.jpg?dl=0 > > Chris > > > On 2018/04/08 06:16 PM, Peter Cripps wrote: > > > > And, 'for the sake of science', I downloaded the .dng and opened it in > > Lr and dt. > > > > The histograms are quite different, even allowing for log vs linear on > > the y-axes. Lr shows a bunch of high intensity pixels on the far right > > hand side; these are missing in dt. This is before applying any sliders. > > > > Again, I have seen similar results on several other images. > > > > > > > > > > On 04/08/2018 05:54 PM, Chris wrote: > >> > >> Hi Guillermo, > >> > >> For the sake of science here is the .dng file I was using for both > >> the DT & LR examples earlier. > >> > >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/cavd1o7z8r5ao0n/_MG_1496.dng?dl=0 > >> > >> Busy playing with it now paying more attention to the histogram. > >> > >> Chris
might be better if you would provide the "original" raw image instead of the conversion to dng image. no conversion contains all the exact "original" image data. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
