* Chris <bydersjo...@gmail.com> [04-08-18 21:22]:
> Fascinating! So dt is clipping somewhere somehow, or the dng format
> 'pro' adobe somehow? :p
> So, just taking this further and assuming the detail I was looking for
> was in the red channel.. I was able to desaturate the reds... but
> obviously this would not work if I had someone wearing red in the
> photograph. Proof that the detail exists though, albeit in an odd
> channel for clouds.
> On 2018/04/08 06:16 PM, Peter Cripps wrote:
> > And, 'for the sake of science', I downloaded the .dng and opened it in
> > Lr and dt.
> > The histograms are quite different, even allowing for log vs linear on
> > the y-axes. Lr shows a bunch of high intensity pixels on the far right
> > hand side; these are missing in dt. This is before applying any sliders.
> > Again, I have seen similar results on several other images.
> > On 04/08/2018 05:54 PM, Chris wrote:
> >> Hi Guillermo,
> >> For the sake of science here is the .dng file I was using for both
> >> the DT & LR examples earlier.
> >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/cavd1o7z8r5ao0n/_MG_1496.dng?dl=0
> >> Busy playing with it now paying more attention to the histogram.
> >> Chris
might be better if you would provide the "original" raw image instead of
the conversion to dng image. no conversion contains all the exact "original"
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri
Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net
Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org