True... ultimately everyone's help here has been great, definitely getting close to a work around.
Speaking of lossy .dng files... what would your suggestions be for an alternative format that maintains a good amount of data without costing to much in filesize? Chris On 2018/04/08 08:04 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Chris <bydersjo...@gmail.com> [04-08-18 22:35]: >> Agreed! The original cr2 would have more data. >> >> The fact remains though that LR is able to do a much better job with >> this compressed DNG than DT can. >> >> Chris >> >> >> On 2018/04/08 07:21 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: >>> might be better if you would provide the "original" raw image instead of >>> the conversion to dng image. no conversion contains all the exact >>> "original" >>> image data. > and you are using lr's app to convert the original to a file designed to > be as compatible as possible to lr, not dt. you will achieve better > results in dt using the *original* file format. > > dng is definitely not designed with the intent to be compatible with > anything not sold by adobe. adobe wants profits, it doesn't intend to > give *anything* away. > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
